![antivirus for os x needed antivirus for os x needed](https://icdn.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/macbook-air-2018-review-feature.jpg)
![antivirus for os x needed antivirus for os x needed](https://www.f-secure.com/content/dam/f-secure/en/consumer/images/open-graph/articles/do-macs-iphones-and-ipads-need-antivirus.jpg)
#Antivirus for os x needed mac#
Mac is no less vulnerable to attacks then Windows or any Linux distro. So a lot of early on attacks were targeting Windows OS's because they were the go to in the corporate world, and even in today's world most businesses will have a majority of their systems running Windows. The reasoning behind this logic was at the time a lot of vulnerabilities were posted that were related to Windows Operating Systems because of the fact that a lot of businesses used Windows. While this can be somewhat true and I would be more willing to say Linux is a little more secure than Windows, it still doesn't make the system immune. They learn, or rather think, that Linux is more secure than Windows, or they hear that Windows is insecure. Some individuals learn that Mac is based on Unix/Linux. That's a very bad assumption, and the idea was brought about by individuals who gave Windows a bad stigma, and were pro-Apple. I think you're hearing information that was generally thought by not so tech savvy people that a Mac doesn't require AV, or is less susceptible to attacks.